<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Testing New Search Layout</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ginside.com/2010/3910/google-testing-new-search-layout/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ginside.com/2010/3910/google-testing-new-search-layout/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=google-testing-new-search-layout</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2011 14:16:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen</title>
		<link>http://www.ginside.com/2010/3910/google-testing-new-search-layout/#comment-986</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 09:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ginside.com/?p=3910#comment-986</guid>
		<description>No NO NO, change it back to the old one, it was much nicer and simpler to use~!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No NO NO, change it back to the old one, it was much nicer and simpler to use~!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Rutkowski</title>
		<link>http://www.ginside.com/2010/3910/google-testing-new-search-layout/#comment-985</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Rutkowski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 10:25:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ginside.com/?p=3910#comment-985</guid>
		<description>Having to deal with the fade-in bar is already a continuing daily annoyance.

I got a taste of the new homepage the other day, which I was able to get rid of by clearing my cookies.

If this blindingly bright, huge-text, mandatory left-bar bullshit comes back, I&#039;m outa here for good Google.

Seriously, what the f**k are you people thinking?

At least give us the option of turing back to the old homepage, I&#039;m sure it&#039;s well within your technical ability.

-Patrick

P.S.
I want a &quot;disable fade-in&quot; option, PLEEEEEEEEEEASE. I use maps, news, and videos often enough to be very annoyed when I have to go through the whole process of:

1) Hey, I want a news page
2) Wait... it&#039;s invisible
3) Right, I have to move the mouse
4) 
5) Wait...
6) Wait..
7) Ok there it is
8) Click

WHAT THE F**K IS THAT FOR!? :-/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having to deal with the fade-in bar is already a continuing daily annoyance.</p>
<p>I got a taste of the new homepage the other day, which I was able to get rid of by clearing my cookies.</p>
<p>If this blindingly bright, huge-text, mandatory left-bar bullshit comes back, I&#8217;m outa here for good Google.</p>
<p>Seriously, what the f**k are you people thinking?</p>
<p>At least give us the option of turing back to the old homepage, I&#8217;m sure it&#8217;s well within your technical ability.</p>
<p>-Patrick</p>
<p>P.S.<br />
I want a &#8220;disable fade-in&#8221; option, PLEEEEEEEEEEASE. I use maps, news, and videos often enough to be very annoyed when I have to go through the whole process of:</p>
<p>1) Hey, I want a news page<br />
2) Wait&#8230; it&#8217;s invisible<br />
3) Right, I have to move the mouse<br />
4)<br />
5) Wait&#8230;<br />
6) Wait..<br />
7) Ok there it is <img src='http://www.ginside.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_cool.gif' alt='8)' class='wp-smiley' /> Click</p>
<p>WHAT THE F**K IS THAT FOR!? :-/</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Orchard</title>
		<link>http://www.ginside.com/2010/3910/google-testing-new-search-layout/#comment-984</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Orchard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 13:38:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ginside.com/?p=3910#comment-984</guid>
		<description>Personally - I think this trip to candyland is a bit extreme. Google has been known for simple, yet functional search. Adding this much bright color is harsh on the eyes and doesn&#039;t provide enough compelling contrast as is needed. At least Bing nailed the colors for their site - Google, what gives? I&#039;m fairly certain that I&#039;m not going to be the only one to start jumping ship if you&#039;re going to start using bright colors on a white background. Secondly, your font sizes....c&#039;mon - take a serious look at it. You&#039;re diluting the significance of search. Period. Making the typeset the same size as the title&#039;s for SERP&#039;s and disabling the ability to &quot;hide&quot; that menu is a sad move. So long....user friendliness. On a last note, Bing&#039;s sidebar is actually useful - and presents significantly more accurate information that can be used - not a horrible duplication of the top menu that Google is known for.

Remember...these are my views - not yours...but if your&#039;s match - let me know!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally &#8211; I think this trip to candyland is a bit extreme. Google has been known for simple, yet functional search. Adding this much bright color is harsh on the eyes and doesn&#8217;t provide enough compelling contrast as is needed. At least Bing nailed the colors for their site &#8211; Google, what gives? I&#8217;m fairly certain that I&#8217;m not going to be the only one to start jumping ship if you&#8217;re going to start using bright colors on a white background. Secondly, your font sizes&#8230;.c&#8217;mon &#8211; take a serious look at it. You&#8217;re diluting the significance of search. Period. Making the typeset the same size as the title&#8217;s for SERP&#8217;s and disabling the ability to &#8220;hide&#8221; that menu is a sad move. So long&#8230;.user friendliness. On a last note, Bing&#8217;s sidebar is actually useful &#8211; and presents significantly more accurate information that can be used &#8211; not a horrible duplication of the top menu that Google is known for.</p>
<p>Remember&#8230;these are my views &#8211; not yours&#8230;but if your&#8217;s match &#8211; let me know!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ricardo Dirani</title>
		<link>http://www.ginside.com/2010/3910/google-testing-new-search-layout/#comment-983</link>
		<dc:creator>Ricardo Dirani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 03:40:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ginside.com/?p=3910#comment-983</guid>
		<description>They seemed to have field tested it today. A couple of hours ago, it was looking like this,with the column to the left, like Bing. Now it&#039;s back to how it was.

At first I couldn&#039;t tell what was different, just that something was amiss. I tried to find in the settings something affecting the layout but there was nothing. Then I realized what it was.

Another difference is that it was listing many pages under the same domain, instead of one hit, a couple more after it indented to show it is under that, and a link to &quot;more from xpto.com&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They seemed to have field tested it today. A couple of hours ago, it was looking like this,with the column to the left, like Bing. Now it&#8217;s back to how it was.</p>
<p>At first I couldn&#8217;t tell what was different, just that something was amiss. I tried to find in the settings something affecting the layout but there was nothing. Then I realized what it was.</p>
<p>Another difference is that it was listing many pages under the same domain, instead of one hit, a couple more after it indented to show it is under that, and a link to &#8220;more from xpto.com&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mobai</title>
		<link>http://www.ginside.com/2010/3910/google-testing-new-search-layout/#comment-982</link>
		<dc:creator>mobai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 07:08:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ginside.com/?p=3910#comment-982</guid>
		<description>oh.i like it~ :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oh.i like it~ <img src='http://www.ginside.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Honey</title>
		<link>http://www.ginside.com/2010/3910/google-testing-new-search-layout/#comment-981</link>
		<dc:creator>Honey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 23:49:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ginside.com/?p=3910#comment-981</guid>
		<description>I guess I wouldn&#039;t mind the change if they didn&#039;t incorporate so much color. I think I&#039;d prefer just a text link.

It will take some getting used to!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess I wouldn&#8217;t mind the change if they didn&#8217;t incorporate so much color. I think I&#8217;d prefer just a text link.</p>
<p>It will take some getting used to!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Dingman</title>
		<link>http://www.ginside.com/2010/3910/google-testing-new-search-layout/#comment-980</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Dingman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 23:09:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ginside.com/?p=3910#comment-980</guid>
		<description>hmm what?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hmm what?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Holdren</title>
		<link>http://www.ginside.com/2010/3910/google-testing-new-search-layout/#comment-979</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Holdren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 22:28:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ginside.com/?p=3910#comment-979</guid>
		<description>Oh my aching scraper!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh my aching scraper!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using disk: basic
Database Caching using apc
Object Caching 396/458 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.ginside.com @ 2012-02-11 19:06:48 -->
