Comments on: Google Launches the Ad Auction http://www.ginside.com/2009/3123/google-launches-ad-auction/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=google-launches-ad-auction Sat, 10 Dec 2011 14:16:52 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: SEO@Payment System http://www.ginside.com/2009/3123/google-launches-ad-auction/#comment-796 SEO@Payment System Mon, 16 Mar 2009 06:01:45 +0000 http://www.ginside.com/?p=3123#comment-796 when more advertiser has bid on higher position and they got the highest because they pay more ,careless whether it has relevancy or not I think it will poor Google rather then Rich them however I only view this video at the first 1 minute I think I need comment now from someone who already hear and see all the video content when more advertiser has bid on higher position and they got the highest because they pay more ,careless whether it has relevancy or not I think it will poor Google rather then Rich them however I only view this video at the first 1 minute I think I need comment now from someone who already hear and see all the video content

]]> By: Dan PPCPROZ http://www.ginside.com/2009/3123/google-launches-ad-auction/#comment-795 Dan PPCPROZ Fri, 13 Mar 2009 07:03:52 +0000 http://www.ginside.com/?p=3123#comment-795 Relevancy of the landing page is only a small part of the landing page formula, did you catch that? We don’t know exactly how much power this carries, but my guess is 30%. If that is true… Then landing page relevancy is really only: 30% x 10% = 3% of the quality score?!! That can’t be, can it? Google prides itself on Relevancy so, how can this possibly be I ask you? I hope I’m wrong on this. Relevancy of the landing page is only a small part of the landing page formula, did you catch that? We don’t know exactly how much power this carries, but my guess is 30%.

If that is true…

Then landing page relevancy is really only:

30% x 10% = 3% of the quality score?!!

That can’t be, can it? Google prides itself on Relevancy so, how can this possibly be I ask you? I hope I’m wrong on this.

]]>