<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Going for a Spin with Google Chrome</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ginside.com/2008/1953/spin-google-chrome/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ginside.com/2008/1953/spin-google-chrome/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=spin-google-chrome</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2011 14:16:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Dingman</title>
		<link>http://www.ginside.com/2008/1953/spin-google-chrome/#comment-639</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Dingman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 20:27:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ginside.com/?p=1953#comment-639</guid>
		<description>Crayboff,

Yeah, I&#039;m definitely with you on the last comment.  Until I can use my extensions on Chrome, I won&#039;t be switching either.

There are just certain tools that I need to be able to browse the web properly.

Again, you&#039;re head on with it, it&#039;s just the matter of time before extensions come out.

It does have a different engine, WebKit vs. Gecko, so the CSS rendering is slightly different.  But overall, I&#039;m very satisfied with it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Crayboff,</p>
<p>Yeah, I&#8217;m definitely with you on the last comment.  Until I can use my extensions on Chrome, I won&#8217;t be switching either.</p>
<p>There are just certain tools that I need to be able to browse the web properly.</p>
<p>Again, you&#8217;re head on with it, it&#8217;s just the matter of time before extensions come out.</p>
<p>It does have a different engine, WebKit vs. Gecko, so the CSS rendering is slightly different.  But overall, I&#8217;m very satisfied with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crayboff</title>
		<link>http://www.ginside.com/2008/1953/spin-google-chrome/#comment-638</link>
		<dc:creator>Crayboff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 20:17:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ginside.com/?p=1953#comment-638</guid>
		<description>Ya, you&#039;re right. The comic was fine, but not many people knew of it.

My thoughts on the browser: I take back what I said before. After having used it for a full day, I have to say I&#039;m overall pleased. I do have some problems with it, only being that some plugins don&#039;t work with it and it&#039;s lacking add-ons. But I realize it&#039;s only a matter of time before these things are produced.

As much as I hate to say it, I believe Google Chrome as the potential (in future versions) to become an uber-Firefox. &#039;Till then I&#039;ll be sticking with Mozilla.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ya, you&#8217;re right. The comic was fine, but not many people knew of it.</p>
<p>My thoughts on the browser: I take back what I said before. After having used it for a full day, I have to say I&#8217;m overall pleased. I do have some problems with it, only being that some plugins don&#8217;t work with it and it&#8217;s lacking add-ons. But I realize it&#8217;s only a matter of time before these things are produced.</p>
<p>As much as I hate to say it, I believe Google Chrome as the potential (in future versions) to become an uber-Firefox. &#8216;Till then I&#8217;ll be sticking with Mozilla.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Dingman</title>
		<link>http://www.ginside.com/2008/1953/spin-google-chrome/#comment-637</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Dingman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 19:20:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ginside.com/?p=1953#comment-637</guid>
		<description>The comic had very poor delivery, in terms of actually being distributed.  They &quot;accidentally&quot; sent it out...but then who did they actually send it to?

Maybe a couple bloggers?

I feel they could have done a lot better of a job with it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The comic had very poor delivery, in terms of actually being distributed.  They &#8220;accidentally&#8221; sent it out&#8230;but then who did they actually send it to?</p>
<p>Maybe a couple bloggers?</p>
<p>I feel they could have done a lot better of a job with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeremyclarke</title>
		<link>http://www.ginside.com/2008/1953/spin-google-chrome/#comment-636</link>
		<dc:creator>jeremyclarke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 18:37:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ginside.com/?p=1953#comment-636</guid>
		<description>I loved the comic, even if the browser is mediocre, the comic explains it so well that I need to try it. I&#039;m not adventurous enough to bother with VMs though, so I&#039;ll have to wait for the mac version.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I loved the comic, even if the browser is mediocre, the comic explains it so well that I need to try it. I&#8217;m not adventurous enough to bother with VMs though, so I&#8217;ll have to wait for the mac version.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using disk: basic
Database Caching using apc
Object Caching 332/394 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.ginside.com @ 2012-02-11 17:19:09 -->
