<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Google Doesn&#8217;t Hate ALL Paid Links, Just Yours</title> <atom:link href="http://www.ginside.com/2008/1803/paid-links/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.ginside.com/2008/1803/paid-links/</link> <description>Unofficial Google News.  Products, Services, Hacks, Tweaks, and more -- everything Google.</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 03:40:26 +0000</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Joseph Hunkins</title><link>http://www.ginside.com/2008/1803/paid-links/#comment-2154</link> <dc:creator>Joseph Hunkins</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 19:14:40 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ginside.com/?p=1803#comment-2154</guid> <description>Jonathan what I have noted when big sites use paid links is that Google may keep ranking the site well but won&#039;t allow the paid links to pass any rank along.  ie the algo slaps a &quot;nofollow&quot; on all the site links.   Although I don&#039;t think they are consistent enough with this it&#039;s basically the right idea.Google&#039;s inconsistency creates a lot frustration that I believe they could reduce with a more transparent statements about *how they handle links* rather than *how they want me to handle links*.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jonathan what I have noted when big sites use paid links is that Google may<br /> keep ranking the site well but won&#8217;t allow the paid links to pass any rank along.  ie the algo slaps a &#8220;nofollow&#8221; on all the site links.   Although I don&#8217;t think they are consistent enough with this it&#8217;s basically the right idea.</p><p>Google&#8217;s inconsistency creates a lot frustration that I believe they could reduce with a more transparent statements about *how they handle links* rather than *how they want me to handle links*.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 4/13 queries in 0.007 seconds using memcached
Content Delivery Network via cache.ginside.com (user agent is rejected)

Served from: www.ginside.com @ 2010-03-20 15:24:53 -->