<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google looks at Buying DoubleClick Inc.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ginside.com/2007/908/google-looks-at-buying-doubleclick-inc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ginside.com/2007/908/google-looks-at-buying-doubleclick-inc/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=google-looks-at-buying-doubleclick-inc</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2011 14:16:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: WeblogToolsCollection Español &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Consejos SEO para WordPress - Seguir o No Seguir</title>
		<link>http://www.ginside.com/2007/908/google-looks-at-buying-doubleclick-inc/#comment-337</link>
		<dc:creator>WeblogToolsCollection Español &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Consejos SEO para WordPress - Seguir o No Seguir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2007 18:35:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ginside.com/2007/908/google-looks-at-buying-doubleclick-inc/#comment-337</guid>
		<description>[...] Estoy usando este plugin para de hecho Seguir los enlaces en mis comentarios. Como podrán ver en un artículo con comentarios yo estoy de hecho siguiendo todos los enlaces que apunten a los autores de los [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Estoy usando este plugin para de hecho Seguir los enlaces en mis comentarios. Como podrán ver en un artículo con comentarios yo estoy de hecho siguiendo todos los enlaces que apunten a los autores de los [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Weblog Tools Collection &#187; Blog Archive &#187; WP SEO Tips: To Follow or Not to Follow</title>
		<link>http://www.ginside.com/2007/908/google-looks-at-buying-doubleclick-inc/#comment-336</link>
		<dc:creator>Weblog Tools Collection &#187; Blog Archive &#187; WP SEO Tips: To Follow or Not to Follow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 10:01:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ginside.com/2007/908/google-looks-at-buying-doubleclick-inc/#comment-336</guid>
		<description>[...] I&#8217;m using this plugin to actually FOLLOW the links in my comments. As you can see on an article with comments that I am indeed following all the links pointing to the authors of the [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I&#8217;m using this plugin to actually FOLLOW the links in my comments. As you can see on an article with comments that I am indeed following all the links pointing to the authors of the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://www.ginside.com/2007/908/google-looks-at-buying-doubleclick-inc/#comment-335</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 04:37:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ginside.com/2007/908/google-looks-at-buying-doubleclick-inc/#comment-335</guid>
		<description>I really think Google will end up buying DoubleClick because they recently moved into the payperaction industry, as I talked about above.

Microsoft has been far behind in all the industries, including search, which leads me to believe that if they did buy DoubleClick, it would be just to spend money and *try* to get back into the game.  Microsoft has fallen too far behind and I don&#039;t believe they can make a recovery at this point.

Microsoft needs to stick to software and leave the web industry alone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really think Google will end up buying DoubleClick because they recently moved into the payperaction industry, as I talked about above.</p>
<p>Microsoft has been far behind in all the industries, including search, which leads me to believe that if they did buy DoubleClick, it would be just to spend money and *try* to get back into the game.  Microsoft has fallen too far behind and I don&#8217;t believe they can make a recovery at this point.</p>
<p>Microsoft needs to stick to software and leave the web industry alone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonix</title>
		<link>http://www.ginside.com/2007/908/google-looks-at-buying-doubleclick-inc/#comment-334</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 03:36:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ginside.com/2007/908/google-looks-at-buying-doubleclick-inc/#comment-334</guid>
		<description>With google and microsoft on the road to this business, it&#039;ll be very interesting to see who&#039;ll be the winner.
This time i&#039;ll bet in microsoft</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With google and microsoft on the road to this business, it&#8217;ll be very interesting to see who&#8217;ll be the winner.<br />
This time i&#8217;ll bet in microsoft</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fierfox CE</title>
		<link>http://www.ginside.com/2007/908/google-looks-at-buying-doubleclick-inc/#comment-333</link>
		<dc:creator>Fierfox CE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 17:52:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ginside.com/2007/908/google-looks-at-buying-doubleclick-inc/#comment-333</guid>
		<description>With Google&#039;s move into the cost per action market as well it would be very interesting to see how they might develop double-click if they do eventually finish up buying it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With Google&#8217;s move into the cost per action market as well it would be very interesting to see how they might develop double-click if they do eventually finish up buying it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using disk: basic
Database Caching using apc
Object Caching 346/408 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.ginside.com @ 2012-02-11 19:43:36 -->
