<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Supports iPhone Unlocking</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ginside.com/2007/1308/google-supports-iphone-unlocking/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ginside.com/2007/1308/google-supports-iphone-unlocking/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=google-supports-iphone-unlocking</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2011 14:16:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Dingman</title>
		<link>http://www.ginside.com/2007/1308/google-supports-iphone-unlocking/#comment-523</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Dingman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 03:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ginside.com/2007/1308/google-supports-iphone-unlocking/#comment-523</guid>
		<description>Robin,

That&#039;s a fair statement and I agree with it.  I do recall that in some countries it is illegal, but I could be wrong.

I am basing this article on the fact that it is illegal somewhere to unlock phones.

This article was &lt;strong&gt;not&lt;/strong&gt; written to oppose competition, I whole-heartedly believe in competition and strongly encourage competition (in fact I love competition), but rather to point out a legal line which I felt was being crossed.

I&#039;m not a lawyer, so I could be wrong.

Thank you for your insight on this topic, it&#039;s much appreciated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robin,</p>
<p>That&#8217;s a fair statement and I agree with it.  I do recall that in some countries it is illegal, but I could be wrong.</p>
<p>I am basing this article on the fact that it is illegal somewhere to unlock phones.</p>
<p>This article was <strong>not</strong> written to oppose competition, I whole-heartedly believe in competition and strongly encourage competition (in fact I love competition), but rather to point out a legal line which I felt was being crossed.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not a lawyer, so I could be wrong.</p>
<p>Thank you for your insight on this topic, it&#8217;s much appreciated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robin</title>
		<link>http://www.ginside.com/2007/1308/google-supports-iphone-unlocking/#comment-522</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 03:08:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ginside.com/2007/1308/google-supports-iphone-unlocking/#comment-522</guid>
		<description>Unlocking phones isn&#039;t illegal at all. It&#039;s a right you&#039;re given under US law (other countries, I don&#039;t know, but I know that in a few of them it&#039;s the same, if not more lenient towards the consumer).

As far as I know, unlocking the iPhone isn&#039;t illegal. Apple and AT&amp;T definitely don&#039;t want you to, and your hacks could easily be fixed in the next firmware version, but it&#039;s still technically legal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unlocking phones isn&#8217;t illegal at all. It&#8217;s a right you&#8217;re given under US law (other countries, I don&#8217;t know, but I know that in a few of them it&#8217;s the same, if not more lenient towards the consumer).</p>
<p>As far as I know, unlocking the iPhone isn&#8217;t illegal. Apple and AT&amp;T definitely don&#8217;t want you to, and your hacks could easily be fixed in the next firmware version, but it&#8217;s still technically legal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Dingman</title>
		<link>http://www.ginside.com/2007/1308/google-supports-iphone-unlocking/#comment-521</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Dingman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 02:51:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ginside.com/2007/1308/google-supports-iphone-unlocking/#comment-521</guid>
		<description>Robin,

That is where I disagree.

Unlocking phones, specifically the iPhone, could be considered illegal.  If Google were to start allowing AdWords ads for warez or illegal items, shouldn&#039;t they be held accountable for their actions?  I think so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robin,</p>
<p>That is where I disagree.</p>
<p>Unlocking phones, specifically the iPhone, could be considered illegal.  If Google were to start allowing AdWords ads for warez or illegal items, shouldn&#8217;t they be held accountable for their actions?  I think so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robin</title>
		<link>http://www.ginside.com/2007/1308/google-supports-iphone-unlocking/#comment-520</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 02:38:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ginside.com/2007/1308/google-supports-iphone-unlocking/#comment-520</guid>
		<description>Saying that because Google runs an ad (of thousands, if not millions) that links to an unaffiliated site, they support unlocking iPhones, is absolutely absurd.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Saying that because Google runs an ad (of thousands, if not millions) that links to an unaffiliated site, they support unlocking iPhones, is absolutely absurd.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using disk: basic
Database Caching using apc
Object Caching 332/394 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.ginside.com @ 2012-02-11 18:51:24 -->
