<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google&#8217;s Creepy Crawlers are Back</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ginside.com/2007/1020/googles-creepy-crawlers-are-back/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ginside.com/2007/1020/googles-creepy-crawlers-are-back/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=googles-creepy-crawlers-are-back</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2011 14:16:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Dingman</title>
		<link>http://www.ginside.com/2007/1020/googles-creepy-crawlers-are-back/#comment-428</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Dingman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2007 14:03:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ginside.com/2007/1020/googles-creepy-crawlers-are-back/#comment-428</guid>
		<description>Mani,

I&#039;m actually not buying links, they are all natural inbound links.

Florchakh,

I agree with that as well.  I definitely do not encourage &quot;random linking&quot; just from high PR sites or from any old site.  Relative links are key to any website&#039;s success in the SEO world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mani,</p>
<p>I&#8217;m actually not buying links, they are all natural inbound links.</p>
<p>Florchakh,</p>
<p>I agree with that as well.  I definitely do not encourage &#8220;random linking&#8221; just from high PR sites or from any old site.  Relative links are key to any website&#8217;s success in the SEO world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Florchakh</title>
		<link>http://www.ginside.com/2007/1020/googles-creepy-crawlers-are-back/#comment-427</link>
		<dc:creator>Florchakh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2007 12:27:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ginside.com/2007/1020/googles-creepy-crawlers-are-back/#comment-427</guid>
		<description>Too many unnatural backlinks may hurt, usually you just need to follow some &quot;smart linking frequency&quot;. To be honest, not in every case - you can put 10k pretty strong links and do well, as well as you can put 1k of hypertext links and get site sandboxed for 3 months :/

I totally agree, quality over quantity, that&#039;s the way it goes!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Too many unnatural backlinks may hurt, usually you just need to follow some &#8220;smart linking frequency&#8221;. To be honest, not in every case &#8211; you can put 10k pretty strong links and do well, as well as you can put 1k of hypertext links and get site sandboxed for 3 months :/</p>
<p>I totally agree, quality over quantity, that&#8217;s the way it goes!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mani</title>
		<link>http://www.ginside.com/2007/1020/googles-creepy-crawlers-are-back/#comment-426</link>
		<dc:creator>Mani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2007 11:45:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ginside.com/2007/1020/googles-creepy-crawlers-are-back/#comment-426</guid>
		<description>Jonathan, I agree with you. the increase in crawlers can be attributed to the increase in backlinks. But yes, increase in number of backlinks is not anything to be worried about, but yes - a sudden increase will raise flags at google. Because in such a case, its likely that you bought too many backlinks.

But a gradual increase over some weeks is alright. And, since you have no control over who links to you - there is nothing to be scared about.Since its all natural links as you mentioned - they are most likely from the same niche or atleast closer.(are there any artificial number of bad neighbourhood links?)

Apart from these two facts - all safe.

Hope it helped.

Cheers!
Mani</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jonathan, I agree with you. the increase in crawlers can be attributed to the increase in backlinks. But yes, increase in number of backlinks is not anything to be worried about, but yes &#8211; a sudden increase will raise flags at google. Because in such a case, its likely that you bought too many backlinks.</p>
<p>But a gradual increase over some weeks is alright. And, since you have no control over who links to you &#8211; there is nothing to be scared about.Since its all natural links as you mentioned &#8211; they are most likely from the same niche or atleast closer.(are there any artificial number of bad neighbourhood links?)</p>
<p>Apart from these two facts &#8211; all safe.</p>
<p>Hope it helped.</p>
<p>Cheers!<br />
Mani</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Dingman</title>
		<link>http://www.ginside.com/2007/1020/googles-creepy-crawlers-are-back/#comment-425</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Dingman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2007 01:55:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ginside.com/2007/1020/googles-creepy-crawlers-are-back/#comment-425</guid>
		<description>Woops!  Thanks, I corrected it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Woops!  Thanks, I corrected it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren</title>
		<link>http://www.ginside.com/2007/1020/googles-creepy-crawlers-are-back/#comment-424</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 19:25:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ginside.com/2007/1020/googles-creepy-crawlers-are-back/#comment-424</guid>
		<description>Just thought I should pouint out a spelling-mistake (or so I believe).

“Is it possible that too many backlinks is back for your site?”
should be:

“Is it possible that too many backlinks is bad for your site?”</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just thought I should pouint out a spelling-mistake (or so I believe).</p>
<p>“Is it possible that too many backlinks is back for your site?”<br />
should be:</p>
<p>“Is it possible that too many backlinks is bad for your site?”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using disk: basic
Database Caching using apc
Object Caching 346/408 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.ginside.com @ 2012-02-11 18:59:59 -->
