Comments on: Google Groups Still in Beta? http://www.ginside.com/2006/561/google-groups-still-in-beta/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=google-groups-still-in-beta Sat, 10 Dec 2011 14:16:52 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Jonathan Dingman http://www.ginside.com/2006/561/google-groups-still-in-beta/#comment-172 Jonathan Dingman Sun, 17 Dec 2006 22:38:32 +0000 http://www.ginside.com/2006/561/google-groups-still-in-beta/#comment-172 Yeah, that's a problem I see with Google products. Where's the fine line of "beta" and "stable released"? Yeah, that’s a problem I see with Google products. Where’s the fine line of “beta” and “stable released”?

]]> By: shorty114 http://www.ginside.com/2006/561/google-groups-still-in-beta/#comment-171 shorty114 Sun, 17 Dec 2006 19:41:41 +0000 http://www.ginside.com/2006/561/google-groups-still-in-beta/#comment-171 Well, "beta" is the new buzzword of today. So anything with "beta" has to be cool, right? ;) Flickr's been around for ages, and it's in "gamma." Well, “beta” is the new buzzword of today. So anything with “beta” has to be cool, right? ;)

Flickr’s been around for ages, and it’s in “gamma.”

]]> By: John http://www.ginside.com/2006/561/google-groups-still-in-beta/#comment-170 John Sun, 17 Dec 2006 16:45:49 +0000 http://www.ginside.com/2006/561/google-groups-still-in-beta/#comment-170 There's a difference in the UI, see <a href="http://groups.google.com/group/Google_Webmaster_Help-Sitemap" rel="nofollow">old style</a> vs <a href="http://groups-beta.google.com/group/gsitecrawler" rel="nofollow">new style</a> (just to pick any two). The new style has room for a welcome message, user pages, shared files and a member list (not all shown on the group linked). There’s a difference in the UI, see old style vs new style (just to pick any two). The new style has room for a welcome message, user pages, shared files and a member list (not all shown on the group linked).

]]>